LETTERS TO THE EDITOR POLICY

Letters to the Editor Policy
 

  • The word-count limit for letters is 350, including signatures (with exceptions at the discretion of the editor).
  • Letters may be edited for length, style, and clarity.
  • Email letters to editor@harvardpress.net with “Letter to the Editor” in the subject line, or send by regular mail to Editor, The Harvard Press, P.O. Box 284, Harvard, MA 01451. Deadline is 5 p.m. Tuesday to be included in that Friday's edition.
  • Letters should include your name, address, and phone number. Phone numbers and house numbers will not be printed; they are used only for verification.
  • We will not print anonymous letters, form letters, blanket-mail letters, or letters that we consider libelous.
  • We will not print more than one letter from the same person in any given week.
  • Letters must be signed by individuals; we do not accept group names as signatures. Up to four people may sign a letter on behalf of a group; all must provide addresses and phone numbers.
  • During contests for public office, we will not publish endorsement letters the Friday before an election. Based on space availability, we may limit the number of endorsement letters in a given week, but will strive to print a balanced representation of letters received. We will not publish negative letters about any candidate.
  • All letters may be read online by Harvard Press subscribers who are logged-on registered users of the website.

Proposed change to super town meeting is hardly an ‘overreach’

The Harvard-Devens Jurisdiction Committee appears to be overly concerned regarding Gov. Healey’s bill proposing to replace the existing super town meeting with a single community meeting to approve changes to the Devens Reuse Plan or zoning bylaws. How inconvenient for Harvard that they may lose their current veto power over changes at Devens. Given that Devens has not been under Harvard’s jurisdiction for over 100 years, that Harvard has not invested in the redevelopment of Devens, and that there now exists a base of Devens residents and businesses, Harvard’s veto power is an anachronism.

Gov. Healey has not proposed cutting Harvard out of the loop. Harvard would still get to engage in any dialogue concerning changes to Devens, and still be able to vote on those changes. Harvard would simply need to convince a plurality of those attending the single community meeting to stop any changes it opposes. This change is hardly an “overreach.”

Jim Geller
43 Walnut Street, Devens

Please login or register to post comments.
Latest News
Latest Features