by Joseph Spinelli ·
Friday, April 4, 2025
I enjoy this paper and its community focus, but the editor’s note on Bonnie Chandler’s tree-cutting bylaw letter puzzled me.
Ms. Chandler shared her view—tying the bylaw to climate change debates—only to have the editor “fact-check” her with a UN report. Is it an editor’s job to snipe at readers’ opinions?
Letters to the editor should be a space for diverse voices, not a platform for editorial rebuttals. If you disagree, write your own editorial—or don’t publish the letter if it offends you; at least we’d never know. But adding your opinion, even as “fact,” stifles debate, especially on controversial topics. Let readers decide what holds up. Tacking on notes like that risks alienating those who value open discussion over curated consensus. Isn’t this section for viewpoints, not verdicts?
This overreach might explain declining readership and media trust. People don’t want lectures from a paper they support, especially not when contributing their thoughts. If editors play referee instead of facilitator, why submit letters?
Keep letters raw and real, reflecting our town’s range of thought. Save commentary for the opinion page to foster trust and keep readers engaged.
Joseph Spinelli
Still River Depot Road