The League of Women Voters has no formal position in support of the question of a charter for Harvard (the League has an established protocol that must be followed to adopt a formal position either for or against an issue). However, one of the League’s central principles is that democracy works best with broad, informed citizen participation.
If the charter question passes, we believe Harvard would be best served by a commission whose membership is balanced and representative, one that includes the voices and perspectives of those who may not have served in the past, as well as those of experienced citizens. People who have not yet been engaged in town governance should consider this a unique opportunity to contribute their skills and become engaged.
We’d like to thank the Press for running the “Election Guide” last week and would remind voters who may not be interested in the charter commission about those 13 open seats on town boards this year. This Saturday at 2 p.m. those interested in the charter commission can find out more at the League-sponsored forum. And at 7 p.m., prospective candidates can get nominated at the Town Caucus.
We hope to see that all candidates—for existing town offices as well as the charter commission—be committed to fostering an atmosphere of mutual respect, civil discourse, and openness to change.
Patti Anklam, president
League of Women Voters of Harvard
