The transactional relationship I have with communities of which I’m a member—communities varying in size from 5, to 5000, to 250 million—is not one of “pay as I go” and not one of “paying only my fair share.” It can’t be.
Why? Because I’m the beneficiary of an extremely generous inheritance, an inheritance that includes the obligation to pass it on to the next generation. Here are a few examples of that inheritance: principles—civil rights; institutions—tripartite government; infrastructure—the highway system; and land—we are but temporary stewards.
This great largess requires not only basic maintenance, but enhancements that leverage the benefits of new technologies and incorporate our greater understanding of human nature. Systems in Harvard to which we unfailingly apply this notion are education and fire fighting. In both cases techniques, policies and infrastructure are carefully and regularly reviewed and improved.
Less methodically do we consider our systems of volunteer governance and physical infrastructure. Consequently, wear and tear on committees and buildings is beginning to show.
Near the top of the agenda of good government is identification of “projects.” Yes, even if they cost money. Why? Because, to do so is to fulfill our obligation to maintain, enhance and pass on our inheritance. To disparage this act, as done by a letter writer in last week’s paper, is misguided.
Ron Ostberg
Warren Avenue
